Optimization Identification of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) seeds in rapeseed seed lots by morphological, chemical and Molecular methods

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 - Faculty member Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

2 Researcher of Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran

Abstract

In the national standard for canola seed production, wild mustard is considered an illegal weed. Although canola and wild mustard can be distinguished by the morphological traits, it is not possible to distinguish the seeds of two species, especially the coated seeds. The present study was conducted to optimize the identification and detection of wild mustard seeds in rapeseed lots by morphological, chemical and molecular methods. The other seed count test was performed according to the rules of international seed test in rapeseed sampling. Chemical test design was performed under KOH treatment. The results of the chemical test were presented in five different status. Three specific markers of DA, DC and 5S rDNA were used, respectively. The Cruc marker is thought to be an internal control. Multiple polymerase chain reaction show amplification patterns of wild-mustard seed-specific markers with 5S rDNA amplified 190 bp that did not amplify in canola seeds. DA and DC markers in canola seeds amplified 239 and 625 bp, respectively, which did not amplify in wild mustard. According to molecular specific Profile and comparison with different status of rapeseed. Morphological limitation features and similarity of expression states of seed-related traits in wild mustard and rapeseed and factors such as seed coverage and chemical treatment restriction of wild mustard from rapeseed masses according International seed testing will not be possible, in which case DNA-based molecular tools will provide reliable results.

Keywords

References

Agrawal, R.L., and A. Pawar. 1990. Identification of soybean varieties based on seed and seedling characteristics. Seed Res. 18:77-81.
Allen, L. M. 1917. The chloral hydrate test for Brassica arvensis. Proceedings of the Association of Official Seed Analysts of North America. 9: 29-30.
SPCRI. 2016. National standard for rapeseed production. Seed and Plant Certification and Registration Institute (SPCRI). [Online] Available at https://spcri.ir/dorsapax/userfiles/file/m.fani/kolza.pdf.
ISTA. 2021. International rules for seed testing. International Seed Testing Association (ISTA). Zurich, Switzerland.
ISTA. 2021. ISTA List of Stabilised Plant Names. The International Seed Testing Association (ISTA) Zurich, Switzerland.
Baxter, D., and L.O. Copeland. 2008. Seed Purity and Taxonomy. Michigan State University Press, East Lansing, Michigan, U.S.
Chèvre, A.M., P. Barret, F. Eber, P. Dupuy, H. Brun, X. Tanguy, and M. Renard. 1997. Selection of stable Brassica napus-B. juncea recombinant lines resistant to blackleg (Leptoshaeria maculans).1. Identification of molecular markers, chromosomal and genomic origin of the introgression. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:1104-1111.
Cheng, F., W. Jian, and W. Xiaowu. 2014. Genome triplication drove the diversification of Brassica plants. Hortic. Res. 1: 14024. Doi: 10.1038/hortres.2014.24.
Flannery, M., F. Mitchell, S. Coyne, T. Kavanagh, J. Burke, N. Salamin, P. Dowding, and T. Hodkinson. 2006. Plastid genome characterization in Brassica and Brassicaceae using a new set of nine SSRs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 113(7): 1221-1231.
Ghadami, N. 2010. Agricultural and breeding (Canola). (Planting, Had, Harvest) Agricultural education and promotion publications, Tehran, Iran. (In Persian)
Himanshu, Rai., O. Hamid Peerzada, O.S. Dahiya, and S.S. Jakhar. 2018. Varietal Identification Based on Chemical Methods in Different Varieties of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L.) (Czern. & Coss.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 7 (5): xx-xx. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.xx
Holm, L., J. Doll, E. Holm, J. Poncho, J. Herberger. 1997. World Weeds. Natural Histories and Distribution. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., USA.
Hosaka, K., S.F. Kianian, J.M. McGrath, and C.F. Quiros. 1990. Development and chromosomal localization of genome-specific DNA markers of Brassica and the evolution of amphidiploids and n=9 diploid species. Genome. 33: 131-142.
Jamali, H., L. Sadeghi, L., and M. Najafian. 2017. A Multiplex PCR assay for Discriminating Charlock from Rapeseed: Implications for Seed Testing. Biol. Forum – Int. J. 9 (2): 87-91.
Koh, J.C.O., D.M. Barbulescu, S. Norton, B. Redden, Ph. A. Salisbury, S. Kaur, N. Cogan, and A.T. Slater. 2017. A multiplex PCR for rapid identification of Brassica species in the triangle of U. Plant Methods.13:49. Doi: 10.1186/s13007-017-0200-8.
La Mura, M., C. Norris, S. Sporle, D. Jaya weera, A. Greenland, and D. Lee. 2010. Development of genome-specific 5S rDNA markers in Brassica and related species for hybrid testing. Genome. 53(8): 643-649.
Liu, J., D. Mei, Y. Li, S. Huang, and Q. Hu. 2014. Deep RNA-Seq to unlock the gene bank of floral development in Sinapis arvensis. Plos one 9(9): e105775.
Liu, J., R. Xiang, W. Wang, D. Mei, Y. Li, A.S. Mason, L. Fu, and Q. Hu. 2015. Cytological and molecular analysis of Nsa CMS in Brassica napus L. Euphytica. 206 (2): 279-286.
Mennan, H. 2003. Economic Thresholds of Sinapis arvensis (Wild Mustard) in Winter Wheat Fields. J. Agron, 2: 34-39. Doi: 10.3923/ja.2003.34.39.
Nagendra, M.S., P. Selvaraju, R. Jerlin, K. Ganesamurthy, and N. Senthil. 2020.  Identification and characterization of popular rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties through chemical tests. Journal of Phytology.12: 82-85. Doi: 10.25081/jp. 2020.v12.6513.
Quiros, CF., J. Hu, P. This, A.M. Chèvre, and M. Delseny. 1991. Development and chromosomal localization of genome-specific markers by polymerase chain reaction in Brassica. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 627-632.
Rashed Mohasel, M. 2001. Cereal production, Jehad-e-university- Ferdosi University of Mashhad, Iran. (In Persian)
Rieger, M. A., C. Preston, and S.B. Powles. 1999. Risks of gene flow from transgenic herbicide-resistant canola (Brassica napus) to weedy relatives in southern Australian cropping systems. Aust J. Agric. Res 50: 115-128.
Schelfhout, C., R. Snowdon, W. Cowling,W., Wroth, J. 2004. A PCR based B-genome-specific marker in Brassica species. Theor Appl Genet. 109(5): 917-921.
Snowdon, R., H. Winter, A. Diestel, and M. Sacristan. 2000. Development and characterization of Brassica napus-Sinapis arvensis addition lines exhibiting resistance to Leptosphaeria maculans. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101(7): 1008- 1014.
Somers, D. J., and G. Demmon. 2002. Identification of repetitive, genome-specific probes in crucifer oilseed species. Genome. 45: 485–492.
Song, K. M., T.C. Osborn, and P.H. Williams. 1988. Brassica taxonomy based on nuclear restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) 1. Genome evolution of diploid and amphidiploids species. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 784-794.
Truco, M.J. J. Hu, J. Sadowski, and C.F. Quiros. 1996. Inter- and intragenomic homology of the Brassica genomes: implications for their origin and evolution. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93: 1225-1233.
Van der Burg, W.J., and G. Vierbergeen. 1979. Distinguishing Sinapis arvensis from Brassica napus and B. rapa (B. compestris). Seed Sci. Technol.7: 567.
Vishwanath, K., H.M. Pallavi, N. Nethra, and S.  Rajendra Prasad. 2013. Chemical tests for identification and characterization of tomato cultivars. Plant breeding and seed science. 68: 3-13. Doi: 10.2478/v10129-011-0076-0.
Warwick, S. I., H.J. Beckie, A.G. Thomas, and T. McDonald. 2000. The biology of Canadian weeds. 8 Sinapis arvensis L. (Updated). Can. J. Plant Sci. 80: 939–961.
Yan, M., X. Liu, C. Guan, L. Liu, J. Xiang, Y. Lu, and Z. Liu. 2014. Cloning of TTG1 gene and PCR identification of genomes A, B and C in Brassica species. Genetica. 142(2): 169-176.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics