The Effects of Production Region and Seed Weight on Some Characteristics Related with Germinability and Seedling Vigour of Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

To study the effect of production region and seed weight on some characteristics related with germinability and seedling vigour of peanut seeds, a research was performed in three peanut fields in Astaneh Ashrafieh and agronomy laboratory of Rasht branch Islamic Azad University during 2010 to 2012. This research was carried out using the standard germination test, cold and accelerated aging. For all tests a factorial experiment with a randomized complete block design in 3 replications was used. First factor was seed production region in 3 levels (Noghredeh, Amshal and Bandar-Kiyashahr) and second factor was seed weight in 3 levels [heavy (seeds heavier than 1 g), medium (seeds between 0.8 and 0.1 g) and light (seeds lighter than 0.8 g)]. The studied characteristics were including: final germination percentage, seedling vigour, radicle dry weight, hypocotyl dry weight, plumule dry weight, cotyledons dry weight and seedling dry weight. Results indicated that effect of region on the final germination percentage, seedling vigour and radicle dry weight were significant in all tests. Peanut seed weights also had a significant effect on radicle dry weight, hypocotyl dry weight, plumule dry weight, cotyledons dry weight and seedling dry weight in all tests.  Interaction of the region and seed weight on the seedling vigour of peanut seeds was significant in all tests. In accelerated ageing test, this interaction was significant on all the studied characteristics except for cotyledons dry weight. Mean comparison of studied characteristics also indicated that the greatest amount of studied parameters was observed from heavier seeds of Amshal region. The maximum germination percentage was detected in seeds produced in Amshal region with average of 86.67%. Also, maximum seedling vigour was achieved in heavy seeds produced in Amshal region with an average 54.24 (standard germination).

Keywords

References

Abdul-Baki, A.A. and J.D. Anderson. 1973. Relationship between decarboxylation of glutamic acid and vigour in soybean seed. Crop Sci. 13: 222-226.
Ahmadi, M.R. 1983. Evaluation of peanut. A Project Report. Seed Plant Improvment Res. Institut, Oilseeds Sector, Karaj, Iran.
Anonymous. 1993. International rules for seed testing. Supplement to Seed Science and Technology, 21: 1-288. Published by: International Seed Testing Assemblage (ISTA).
Anonymous. 2011. International rules for seed testing, The Germination Test. Chapter 5: 1-57.  Published by: International Seed Testing Assemblage (ISTA), Bassersdorf, Switzerland.
Bell, M.J., R.C. Muchow and G.L. Wilson. 1987. The effect of plant population on peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) in a monsoonal tropical environmental. Field Crop Res. 17: 91-107.
Bonan, G.B. 1991. Density effect on size structure of annual plant populations, as indication of neighborhood competition. Ann. Bot. 68: 341-347.
Cox, F.R. 1979. Effect of temperature on peanut vegetative and reproductive growth. Peanut Sci. 6: 14-17.
Deloucheh, J.C. and C.C. Baskin. 1973. Accelerated ageing technique for predicting the relative storability of seed lots. Seed Sci. Technol. 1: 427-452.
Detorja, C.R., S.G. Sadaria, V.D. Khanpara, B.B. Kaneria and D.D. Malavia. 1995. Influence of time of shelling and seed size on yield, quality and nutrient uptake in groundnut (arachis hypogaea). Indian J. Agron. 40: 125-126.
Detroja, C.R., S.G. Sadaria, V.D. Kampara, B.B. Kaneria and D.D. Malavia. 1993. Influence of time of shelling and seed size on yield, quality and nutrient uptake in groundnut (arachis hypogaea L.). Indian J. Agron. 40: 169–71.
Don, R. 2009. ISTA Handbook on Seedling Evaluation. 3rd Edition. Published by: The International Seed Testing Assemblage (ISTA). Bassersdorf, CH- Switzerland.
El-Saidy, A.E.A. and K.M. El-Hai. 2011. Alleviation of peanut deterioration during storage using biotic and abiotic agents. Res. J. Seed Sci. 4(2): 64-81.
Ferguson, J. 1990. Report of seed vigour subcommittee. J. Seed Technol. 14: 182-184.  
Fernandez, E.M., C.A. Rosolem and D.M.T. Oliveria. 2000. Peanut seed tegument is effected by liming and drying method. Seed Sci. Technol. 28(1): 185-192.
Fu, J.R., S.Z. Huang, H.J. Li, D. Come and F.  Corbineau. 1993. Seed vigour in relation to the synthesis and degradation of storage protein in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seeds. Basic and Appl. Aspects Seed Biol. 3: 811-816.
Gardner, F.P. and E.O. Auma. 1988. Canopy structure, light interception, yield and market quality of peanut genotypes as influenced by planting pattern and planting date. Field Crop Res. 20: 13-29.
Gowda, B. and Y.A.N. Reddy. 2008. Storage of Rabi or Summer Groundnut with Desiccants to Prolong Seed Viability and Seedling Vigour. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 21(3): 353-356.
Hampton, J.G. and D.M. TeKrony. 1995. Handbook of Vigour Test Methods. 3nd edition. Published by: International Seed Testing Assemblage (ISTA). Zurich, Switzerland, 117p.
Hepburn, H.A., A.A. Powell, and S. Matthews. 1984. Problems associated with the routine application of electrical conductivity measurements of individual seeds in the germination testing of pea and soybean. Seed Sci. Technol. 12: 403-413.
Hibbard, R.P. and E.V. Miller. 1928. Biochemical studies on seed viability. I. Measurements of conductance and reduction. Plant Physiol. 3: 335-352.
Karimi, H. 2004. Crops. Chapter 5: Oilseed Crop. Section 4: Peanut. University of Tehran Press, pp: 242-246. (In Persian)
Knauft, D.A., D.W. Gorbet and F.G. Martin. 1991. Variation in seed size uniformity among peanut genotypes. Crop Sci. 31: 1324-1327.
Knauft, D.A., D.W. Gorbet and H.C. Wood, 1990. The influence of seed size on agronomic performance of a small seeded spanish peanut line. Proc.Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla. Proc. 49: 135–9.
Koocheki, A. and G. Sarmadnia. 2007. Physiology of crop plants (translate). Mashhad University Jihad Publication. Thirteenth Printing. 400p. (In Persian)
Lott, J.N., V. Cavdek, and J. Carson. 1991. Leakage of K, Mg, Cl, Ca and Mn from imbibing seeds, Grains and Isolated Seed Parts. Seed Sci. Technol. 1: 229-233.
Maiti, R. and P.W. Ebeling. 2002. The peanut (Arachis hypogaea) crop. Science Publishers, Inc. 376p.
Marcos-Filho, J. 1998. New Approaches to Seed Vigor Testing. Sci. Agric. 55: 27-33.
Matthews, S. and W.T. Bradnock. 1967. The detection of seed samples of wrinkled seeded peas (Pisum sativum l.) of potentially value. Proc. Int. Seed Test. Assoc. 32: 553-563.
Mishra, S. N. and A. P. Singh. 1989. Studies on sulphur and phosphorus availability and uptake by groundnut. Legume Res. 12(4): 160-164.
Mugnisjah, W.A. and S. Nakamura, 1986. Vigour soybean seed as influenced by sowing and harvest dates and seed size. Seed Sci. Technol. 7: 87-94.
Nautiyal, P.C. 2009. Seed and seedling vigour traits in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Seed Sci. Technol. 37: 721-735.
Nautiyal, P.C. and P.V. Zala, 2004. Influence of drying method and temperature on germinability and vigour of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) seed harvested in summer season. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 74: 588-593.
Nautiyal, P.C., A. Bandyopadhyay and R.C. Misra. 2004. Drying and storage methods to prolong seed viability of summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in Orissa. Indian J. Agric. Sci.  74: 316-320.
Nautiyal, P.C., J.B. Misra and P.V. Zala. 2010. Influence of seed maturity stages on germinability and seedling vigor in groundnut. J. SAT Agric. Res. 8: 1-10.
Nautiyal, P.C., Y.C. Joshi and P.S. Reddy. 1993. Methods to Preserve Seed Viability in Groundnut. Indian Farming. 43(8): 28-30.
Pallas, J.E. and Y.B. Samish. 1974. Photosynthetic response of peanut. Crop Sci. 14: 478-482.
Parameswaran, M., N. Subhash, Y.M. Shukla and M.K. Chakraborty 1990. Relationship between Groundnut Seed Leachate Characteristics and Its Germination Potential. Proc. Int. Cong. Plant Physiol. India. 2: 1302-1305.   
Perez, M.A. and Aryoello, J.A. 1995. Deterioration in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L. cv. Florman) seeds under natural and accelerated aging, Seed Sci. and Tech. 23: 439-445.
Perry, D.A. 1981. Handbook of Vigour Test Methods. Zurich: International Seed Testing Association and Hall. London, pp: 209-252.
Safarzadeh, M.N. 2008. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Islamic Azad University Publications. 46p.
Sharma, P., V. Sardana, and S.S. Kandhola. 2013. Effect of sowing dates and harvesting dates on germination and seedling vigor of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivars. Res. J. Seed Sci. 6(1): 1-15.
Sibuga, K.P. and J.V. Nsenga. 2003. Effect of seed size on yield of two groundnut genotypes. Trop. Sci. 43: 22-27.
Smartt, J. 1994. The groundnut crop. A scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall Publishing, 756p.
Soltani, A., Galeshi, S., Zeinali, E. and Latifi, N. 2001. Genetic variation for and interrelationships among seed vigor traits in wheat from the Caspian Sea coasts of Iran. Seed Sci. Technol. 29(3): 653-662.
Souhani, M.M. 2010. Seed technology  University of Guilan Press. Third Printing, 287p. (In Persian)
Steere, W.C., W.C. Levengood, and J.M. Bondie. 1981. An electronic analyzer for evaluating seed germination and vigour. Seed Sci. Technol. 9: 567-576.
TeKrony, D.M. 1983. Seed vigour testing. J. Seed Technol. 8: 55-60.
Tekrony, D.M., D.B. Egli and A.D. Philips. 1980. Effect of field weathering on the viability and vigour of soybean seed. Agro. J. 72: 749-753.
Trivedi, M.L. and Bhatt, P.H. 1994. The physiology of seed germination in groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) cultivar GG-2 L effect of seed size, J. Agron. Crop Sci. 172(4): 265-268.
Vindhavarmaan, P., A, Arjuna, V. Mahran, S. Ramalingam and M.R. Sivaram. 1990. Effect of seed size on dry matter production and pod yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Madras Agric. J. 77: 260–1.
Woodstock, L.W. 1969. Biochemical tests for seed vigour. Proc. Int. Seed Test. Assoc. 43: 253-263.
Zode, N.G., S.B. Lall and M.N. Patil. 1995. Studies on seed viability in peanut (Arachis hypogea L.) 1. Effect of soil calcium content on seed viability. Annu. Plant Physiol. 9: 51-54.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics